Archive Links

Consumer Archive
CU System Archive
Market Archive
Products Archive
Washington Archive
150x172_CUEffect.jpg
Contacts
LISA MCCUEVICE PRESIDENT OF COMMUNICATIONS
EDITOR-IN-CHIEF
MICHELLE WILLITSManaging Editor
RON JOOSSASSISTANT EDITOR
ALEX MCVEIGHSTAFF NEWSWRITER
TOM SAKASHSTAFF NEWSWRITER

News Now

CU System
Big Banks Argue Eastern Financial Florida CU Knew the Risks
MIAMI (7/23/13)--Four big banks and two ratings firms have filed a motion to dismiss a lawsuit brought in a Southern Florida federal court by Space Coast CU over $150 million in investment losses that led to the collapse of Eastern Financial Florida CU, which Space Coast later assumed.
 
Eastern invested the amount in collateralized debt obligations (CDOs) backed largely by residential mortgage-backed securities (RMBSs) between 2005 and 2007. 
 
The case involves instruments underwritten by Merrill Lynch, Pierce and Fenner Inc., J.P. Morgan Securities LLC, UBS Securities LLC and Barclays Capital, and rated by ratings agency The McGraw Hill Cos. (Standard & Poor's) and Moody's Investor Services.
 
The motion to dismiss notes that on March 18, the U.S. District Court in Miami rejected the Melbourne, Fla.-based Space Coast's claims of fraud but allowed Space Coast to amend its complaint. In that ruling, the court noted that the suit required "particularized facts" related to the frauds and the specific CDOs, instead of relying on broad due diligence reports, emails and government reports, forensic analysis and reliance on bankruptcy debtors' statements.
 
Space Coast's amended complaint alleged fraud, negligent misrepresentation, unjust enrichment, constructive trust and aiding and abetting fraud. In the motion to dismiss, the defendants argue that Eastern knew the risks. "Indeed the offering documents for these CDOs specifically warned Eastern about the unreliability of the subordination levels and the riskiness of investing in securities linked to subprime and non-conforming loans," said the banks' motion.
 
The banks also argued there is not enough facts supporting the credit union's allegations, that the amended complaint has "recycled allegations" that are not supported by particularized facts, and that the banks cannot be held liable for misstatements they did not make.
 
Like other defenses  in similar lawsuits over RMBS, in which the National Credit Union Administration sued a number of brokerage firms over losses experienced by corporate credit unions, the defendants also argue that the claims are "time-barred" and were not filed on time.


RSS





print
News Now LiveWire
Consumer spending is slumping #Market #Economy http://t.co/RI4HS68IuJ
15 hours ago
April is #NationalFinancialLiteracyMonth & @TheNCUA Chair Matz urges #creditunions to help members learn to manage/protect their finances.
17 hours ago
Fed. FI regulators' statmnts on compromised credentials/destructive malware #cybersecurity http://t.co/f4uTBDm1PU http://t.co/zP5Iw6VxZc
18 hours ago
Home prices rising faster than wages: @RealtyTrac #NewsNow #Market http://t.co/wa74mnw3Cu
20 hours ago
.@Nussle dropped by the @ACUMuseum recently. Read about his visit http://t.co/bYe8RRgYLP
21 hours ago