Archive Links

Consumer Archive
CU System Archive
Market Archive
Products Archive
Washington Archive
150x172_CUEffect.jpg
Contacts
LISA MCCUEVICE PRESIDENT OF COMMUNICATIONS
EDITOR-IN-CHIEF
MICHELLE WILLITSManaging Editor
RON JOOSSASSISTANT EDITOR
ALEX MCVEIGHSTAFF NEWSWRITER
TOM SAKASHSTAFF NEWSWRITER

News Now

CU System
Boards Benefit When Devil's Advocates Are Present
MADISON, Wis. (8/23/13)--A decade after acquiring Gatorade's parent company and turning that brand into every athlete's must-have energy drink, Quaker CEO William Smithburg moved in on another drink surging in popularity: Snapple, according to an article in the August issue of the Credit Union National Association's Credit Union Directors Newsletter.

Despite a $1.8 billion bid and a lot of unanswered questions, Smithburg received the full support of his board of directors. Three brutal years later, Snapple was sold for $300,000 and Smithburg stepped down.

"We should have had a couple of people arguing the 'no' side of the evaluation," he said.
Organizations often suffer when devil's advocacy is in short supply, Chip and Dan Heath illustrate in  "Decisive: How to Make Better Choices in Life and Work."

"We want to avoid the momentary discomfort of being challenged, which is understandable, but surely it's preferable to the pain of walking blindly into a bad decision," the authors wrote.

Some organizations license skepticism by appointing individuals to the task. The best approach is to encourage the entire board to participate in what the authors characterize as "values-based opposition"--avoiding adversarial politics by disagreeing without being disagreeable--and to work as collaborators and analyze options objectively.

Become a better devil's advocate by following these guidelines, the authors advise:
  • Expand the options. Decisions require multiple options, not "yes" or "no" answers. Alarm bells should sound if you're asked "whether or not" to pursue a single alternative. Ask "What else could we do?" to generate other reasonable courses of action.
  • Consider the opposite. Channel the discussion toward objective reasoning by asking, "What would have to be true for this option to be the very best choice?" Roger Martin, dean of the Rotman School of Management at the University of Toronto, asked this question to defuse a tense negotiation over whether to close a historic copper mine in Upper Michigan. In the end, those who pressed for the mine to remain open conceded the numbers didn't add up.
  • Ask pointed questions. Because proponents naturally offer weighted arguments about an issue, it's your job to ask pointed but legitimate questions. The Heath brothers highlight one study that shows a seller wouldn't willingly disclose a major glitch in a used iPod unless directly asked what problems it had.
  • Bookend the future. Don't base decisions on a single forecast of a fixed outcome. Consider the full range of possibilities, from very bad to very good.
  • Honor your core priorities. By identifying and enshrining the tenets that guide your credit union, you make it easier to solve present and future dilemmas. Always ask, "What kind of organization do we want to build?"
For more information about Credit Union Directors Newsletter, use the link.
 
RSS





print
News Now LiveWire
.@LACULeague in @DailyComet: #creditunions' "old" benefits attractive to new generation http://t.co/AzOv3nB7IB
7 hours ago
At @FTC request, court halts operations of an alleged debt-relief scammer calling itself “FTC Credit Solutions.” http://t.co/qMsDBmKExH
12 hours ago
.@daytondailynews : The secret is out about #creditunions http://t.co/Aqu3pFTROV @DayAirCU @CODECreditUnion
13 hours ago
.@CUNA's @Nussle on @SenatorReid :(2of2)On behalf of more than 102M #CU members,I thank him 4 his leadership over the yrs/wish him the best.
15 hours ago
.@CUNA CEO Nussle on Sen. Reid’s decision not 2 seek re-election (1of2): Sen. Reid has a long history of #CU support throughout his career.
15 hours ago