Archive Links

Consumer Archive
CU System Archive
Market Archive
Products Archive
Washington Archive
150x172_CUEffect.jpg
Contacts
LISA MCCUEVICE PRESIDENT OF COMMUNICATIONS
EDITOR-IN-CHIEF
MICHELLE WILLITSManaging Editor
RON JOOSSASSISTANT EDITOR
ALEX MCVEIGHSTAFF NEWSWRITER
TOM SAKASHSTAFF NEWSWRITER

News Now

CU System
CU wins appeal on fidelity bond claim
LATHRUP VILLAGE, Mich. (5/27/11)--A 2009 jury decision in for Michigan First CU in a case about an insurer's denial of a fidelity bond claim involving hundreds of defaulted indirect auto loans has been affirmed by the U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. The $568 million asset, Lathrup Village, Mich.-based credit union is entitled to $5 million in damages and another $2.7 million in interest from CUMIS Insurance Society Inc., according to the ruling filed Tuesday by the appeals court regarding the jury decision in the U.S. District Court of the Eastern District of Michigan at Detroit (leagle.com May 25). In 2003, the credit union began offering the loans, with a third-party administrator approving low-risk loans and forwarding higher risk loan applications to the credit union for review. A credit union vice president was charged with submitting monthly reports to the board to ensure compliance, but failed to monitor the program, the ruling said. A quarterly internal audit in October 2003 discovered one loan that violated the credit union's indirect lending policy, said the court documents. But in January 2004, it was discovered that "hundreds of loan applications in violation of the lending policy" were made, resulting in "numerous defaulted loans." The credit union claimed that it suffered financial harm as a result of three of its employees' "conscious disregard of its lending" policies and filed a fidelity bond claim with its insurer, which denied the claim. A seven-day jury trial ensued, with the jury awarding $5.05 million in damages. A motion for a new trial was denied, and the court imposed a $2.7 million interest award. CUMIS appealed the judgment and the credit union countered with an appeal on the interest calculation. In Tuesday's ruling, the court said there was sufficient record evidence to support the jury's finding that the credit union "did not acquiesce to the policy violations at issue." CUNA Mutual Group declined to comment on the case.


RSS





print
News Now LiveWire
Construction spending drops in January, according to @CommerceGov http://t.co/W9J1mDyF8X #Market #NewsNow
9 hours ago
During Nat'l Consumer Protection Week, @TheNCUA reminds #CU members of agency resources re: rights as consumers. http://t.co/aYgW1HoDmF
10 hours ago
.@TransUnion: #millennials climbing into driver's seat with loans http://t.co/S4H9OIB3Av
12 hours ago
Breaking at #NewsNow: @CUNA backed bill introduced by @RepEdRoyce @GregoryMeeks would raise MBL cap. #CUSmallBiz http://t.co/ZDAb2UMoQz
13 hours ago
Loan growth at federally insured #creditunions in 2014 climbed to highest level since 2005, @TheNCUA reported today. Watch News Now Tues.
13 hours ago