Archive Links

Consumer Archive
CU System Archive
Market Archive
Products Archive
Washington Archive
150x172_CUEffect.jpg
Contacts
LISA MCCUEVICE PRESIDENT OF COMMUNICATIONS
EDITOR-IN-CHIEF
MICHELLE WILLITSManaging Editor
RON JOOSSASSISTANT EDITOR
ALEX MCVEIGHSTAFF NEWSWRITER
TOM SAKASHSTAFF NEWSWRITER

News Now

Washington
Reduce costs, unintended consequences of ACH network changes, CUNA tells NACHA
WASHINGTON (1/14/14)--NACHA--The Electronic Payments Association must minimize costs and unintended consequences for credit unions as it takes steps to improve automated clearinghouse network risk management and enforcement, the Credit Union National Association said in a comment letter.

The NACHA plan could improve NACHA's ability to identify and enforce rules against "outlier" originators, those responsible for the highest levels of exceptions. An originator is any individual, corporation or other entity that initiates entries into the Automated Clearing House Network.

The NACHA proposal would:
  • Reduce the existing return rate threshold for unauthorized debits from 1% to 0.5%;
  • Establish a return rate threshold for account data quality returns (i.e., administrative returns) at 3% and an overall debit return rate threshold (for all return reason codes) at 15%;
  • Clarify the definition of a "reinitiated entry";
  • Apply risk management rules to third-party senders; and
  • Expand NACHA's enforcement authority.
In the letter, CUNA Assistant General Counsel Dennis Tsang noted that credit unions generally originate higher quality transactions and generally support many of the proposed changes to reduce exceptions from "outlier" Originators. However, he noted, originating financial institutions may not be able to fully control the transactions originated by the Originator and may make risk management changes that would reduce access to the ACH network for some consumers, including the underserved.

CUNA also recommended that NACHA:
  • Provide additional risk management tools and resources to assist Originating Depository Financial Institutions (ODFIs);
  • Continue to coordinate closely with, and consider the actions taken by, various federal financial regulators;
  • Conduct additional research and provide more data about enforcement actions and existing return rate thresholds before proceeding with the proposed changes; and
  • Delay compliance dates at least three months beyond the proposed dates of March 20, 2015 for the return and reinitiation changes, and Sept. 19, 2014 for third-party sender and enforcement authority changes.
For the full comment letter, use the resource link.
Other Resources

CUNA Comment Letter
RSS





print
News Now LiveWire
What role are #creditunions playing in @gatesfoundation's 2030 vision of financial services? Read #NewsNow Monday
11 hours ago
Consumers fear inaccurate info lingers on credit reports, says @FTC study Read @CUNA's News Now: http://t.co/RzNLMnaROO
13 hours ago
@PCUA has formed a @LinkedIn networking group for former bankers turned #creditunion employees.
13 hours ago
.@politico reports Democrats haven't picked the city yet, but their 2016 convention will be held the week of July 25.
13 hours ago
.@cuna, @DCUC_HQ urge @CFPB to exempt #CUs from changes to Military Lending Act rules cuz CUs aren't part of the targeted problem. NN Monday
15 hours ago