Archive Links

Consumer Archive
CU System Archive
Market Archive
Products Archive
Washington Archive
150x172_CUEffect.jpg
Contacts
LISA MCCUEVICE PRESIDENT OF COMMUNICATIONS
EDITOR-IN-CHIEF
MICHELLE WILLITSManaging Editor
RON JOOSSASSISTANT EDITOR
ALEX MCVEIGHSTAFF NEWSWRITER
TOM SAKASHSTAFF NEWSWRITER

News Now

Washington
Retail Group Appeals $5.7B N.Y. Interchange Settlement
NEW YORK, N.Y. (1/6/14)--The National Retail Federation last week appealed a $5.7 billion class action interchange suit settlement, asking the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals to overturn a ruling made by U.S. District Judge John Gleeson in the Eastern District of New York, Brooklyn.

The class action settlement, which would be the largest private antitrust damages recovery in U.S. history, was approved in December. The settlement follows a 2008 suit in which merchants alleged MasterCard and Visa set artificially high credit card interchange fees.

NRF Senior Vice President and General Counsel Mallory Duncan in a release said the settlement "is an abuse of the class action system and should never have been approved." She noted that most of the original plaintiffs in the case "repudiated the settlement as soon as they saw its terms."

Some merchants have indicated they will opt out of the approved settlement.

The settlement requires a reduced interchange rate fee of 10 basis points for an eight-month period, and also calls for Visa, MasterCard and the banks to create a fund to repay retailers for past fees charged. Retailers would also be permitted to assess "check out" fees or surcharges on credit card purchases, which has previously been prohibited by Visa and Mastercard rules, under the terms of the settlement.

In a separate ongoing interchange case, NACS, et al. v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, the Credit Union National Association and its partner members of The Clearing House coalition will be in court Jan. 17 to present 10 minutes of oral arguments. In this case, a merchants' coalition has challenged the Fed's implementation of a Dodd-Frank Act-imposed debit interchange cap as too high. CUNA and its partner maintain that the cap, in fact, is too restrictive.

CUNA and it financial services partners have argued that the Fed cap does not factor in enough of the costs that card issuers face for providing their services. (See Dec. 30 News Now story: CUNA, Coalition Partners Added to Jan. 17 Interchange Oral Arguments.)


RSS





print
News Now LiveWire
What role are #creditunions playing in @gatesfoundation's 2030 vision of financial services? Read #NewsNow Monday
1 day ago
Consumers fear inaccurate info lingers on credit reports, says @FTC study Read @CUNA's News Now: http://t.co/RzNLMnaROO
1 day ago
@PCUA has formed a @LinkedIn networking group for former bankers turned #creditunion employees.
1 day ago
.@politico reports Democrats haven't picked the city yet, but their 2016 convention will be held the week of July 25.
1 day ago
.@cuna, @DCUC_HQ urge @CFPB to exempt #CUs from changes to Military Lending Act rules cuz CUs aren't part of the targeted problem. NN Monday
1 day ago