Archive Links

Consumer Archive
CU System Archive
Market Archive
Products Archive
Washington Archive

News Now

Washington
CUNA calls for targeted, cheaper ways to address ODFI exceptions
WASHINGTON (1/16/14)--NACHA--The Electronic Payments Association should examine more targeted, less costly ways to help reduce exceptions by Originating Depository Financial Institutions (ODFIs), the Credit Union National Association said in a comment letter.

The comment letter follows the release of a proposed Automated Clearing House (ACH) rule that would reduce exceptions by establishing a system of economic incentives for ODFIs. An ODFI would pay fees based on exceptions to partially offset the Receiving Depository Financial Institution's (RDFI) costs for exception processing and customer service.

The proposal would require ODFIs to pay the following fees to RDFIs:
  • $.10 to $.40 per return based on incorrect account data;
  • $.25 to $.75 per change, when an RDFI corrects information and sends a Notification of Change; and
  • $1.50 to $2.50 per return related to an issue with the receiver's authorization.
CUNA Assistant General Counsel Dennis Tsang noted that credit unions generally originate higher quality transactions and are not likely to be significantly impacted by the proposal. Also, they would receive fees to offset costs incurred for exception processing and customer service.

However, Tsang said, some credit unions oppose the concept of fees paid by ODFIs based on returns, because ODFIs may not be able to fully control the transactions originated by the Originators. Credit unions feel this approach is not targeted to reduce risk, he said.

The CUNA letter asked NACHA to minimize costs on credit unions that may be affected and minimize unintended consequences. NACHA should conduct a robust, comprehensive study that includes financial institutions of all types and sizes to measure better the costs incurred by all RDFIs for handing exceptions before it moves forward with finalizing the proposal, the CUNA letter added.

The CUNA letter also urged NACHA to:
  • Fully assess and minimize the potential unintended consequences from the proposed changes, including with consumer access to payments;
  • Account for effects from the concurrent proposed rule on ACH network risk and enforcement topics that would reduce return rate thresholds;
  • Provide additional risk management tools and resources to assist ODFIs; and
  • Form a representative panel to oversee the fee-setting process, with a dedicated slot for a credit union representative.
NACHA should also delay the compliance date by at least three months after the proposed March 20, 2015 effective date, CUNA said.

For the full comment letter, use the resource link.
Other Resources

NACHA Comment Letter
RSS print
News Now LiveWire
.@SenatorBegich says @TheNCUA risk-based cap. plan attempts 2 solve problem that does not exist, at expense of those served by CUs. Watch NN
18 minutes ago
Target wants stay of discovery in class action suits in data security breach; plaintiffs disagree that it's needed http://t.co/GHqz2S4u5g
37 minutes ago
New HUD Sec'y Julian Castro gets warm send-off from San Antonio's @alamofcu MT Thanks for all the hard work. http://t.co/peb8x4GSRq
1 hours ago
.@CUANYtweets initiates call to action to Gov. Cuomo to sign state-chartered #creditunion FOM bill
1 hours ago
.@MountainAmerica #creditunion CEO helps TV audience understand credit scores #NewsNow http://t.co/makbsIIdzn
1 hours ago