![]() | |||||||||||
|
Analysis of NCUA Opinion Letters Analysis of NCUA Letters to Credit Unions Federal Credit Union Act Legislative History Important Legal Cases for Credit Unions |
| ||||||||||
CUNA Comment LetterAccuracy of Advertising and Notice of Insured StatusNovember 21, 2008 Ms. Mary Rupp
Dear Ms. Rupp: The Credit Union National Association (CUNA) appreciates the opportunity to comment on the proposed rule to amend the share insurance sign requirements for federally insured credit unions participating in shared branch networks. Currently, for tellers accepting share deposits for both federally insured and nonfederally insured credit unions, there must be a second sign adjacent to the official NCUA insurance sign. The second sign must list each federally insured credit union served by the teller, along with a statement that only those credit unions are federally insured. The proposed rule will replace the required list of credit unions with a general statement that not all of the credit unions served by the teller are federally insured and members should contact their credit union for further information. CUNA represents approximately 90 percent of our nation’s 8,200 state and federal credit unions, which serve nearly 92 million members. Summary of CUNA’s Comments
Discussion To further the goal of reducing burdens associated with these requirements, we suggest that credit unions have additional flexibility for complying with these rules. Instead of a separate, second sign adjacent to each official NCUA insurance sign, we believe credit unions should have the option of posting one sign in a conspicuous location in the lobby that would include the general statement that not all of the credit unions served by the teller are federally insured and members should contact their credit union for further information. Alternatively, instead of the second sign, those credit unions that provide service to members of other credit unions should have the option of providing a similar disclosure that the teller would hand out to these nonmembers. Either of these alternatives should serve the goal of sufficiently informing members of their insurance coverage, especially considering that very few consumers are members of nonfederally insured credit unions. Also, a federally insured credit union that provides service to members of other credit unions should have the option of indicating either on the sign or any separate disclosure that it is federally insured. This should alleviate concerns from members who may not be aware of the insurance status or may believe the status has changed when they read these new signs or disclosures. This is especially important in the current environment in which many consumers are concerned about the safety of the money they have in financial institutions. Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the proposed rule to amend the share insurance sign requirements for shared branch networks. If you or other Board staff have questions about our comments, please give Senior Vice President and Deputy General Counsel Mary Dunn or me a call at (202) 638-5777. Sincerely,
Copyright © 2009 - Credit Union National Association, Inc. |
|||||||||||